Without the Merger, a million ETH would have been created with Ethereum PoW

Sans le Merge, un million d’ETH auraient été créés avec un Ethereum PoW

Almost three months after The Merge, simulations of Ethereum (ETH) following the two consensus models are starting to gain relevance. So the data shows us that if the blockchain was still creating work, more than a million additional ETH would have been created.

With Ethereum PoW, there would be an extra million ETH

It’s been almost three months now since the Ethereum (ETH) Merger, which marks the shift from consensus-of-proof-of-work (PoW), to consensus-of-proof-of-stake (PoS). Apart from the technological prowess of this event, it is also good the creation of new ETH has been greatly reducedso much so that without it, these more than a million new units would have seen the light of day :

Figure 1 – Simulation of the evolution of the distribution in the PoW model

In a POW model, this would be approx $1.28 billion in money supply would be created. Projecting the data on an annual basis, this would equate to 3.06% inflation for 3.7 million new ETH.

But thanks to a change to the PoS consensus, that’s not the case. With the current state of the Ethereum blockchain, the network would even be deflationary taking data on a daily basis, ie -0.47% per year, and taking data neutral over 30 days:

distributional evolution from mergers

Figure 2 – Evolution of ETH distribution since The Merge

It should be noted, however, that these figures are subject to change depending on demand on the network.

👉 To go further – Generate interest by listing your ETH

The reference platform to buy and trade more than 600 cryptos

10% off fees with code SVULQ98B 🔥

toaster icon

To solicit the network on lows

Like its behavior for several months now, the Ethereum blockchain is at a particularly low solicitation level. Number of daily active addresses fell below 400,000which has not happened since the beginning of the 2021 bull run, with the exception of last June.

In the last 24 hours, this data represented approximately 380,000 addresses:

Number of daily active addresses

Figure 3 – The number of daily active addresses on the Ethereum blockchain

On the transaction fee side, the trend is dead calm as well. For many months, average transaction cost regularly drops below $2which has not been seen again since late 2020:

Average transaction price before the bull

Figure 4 – Average transaction price since the end of 2020

To get a better understanding of the trend curve, you have to zoom in a bit when looking at the data since November 2021 was the all-time high rate (ATH) for cryptocurrencies. In fact, with the exception of a statistical distortion at Yuga Labs’ Otherside metaverse land sale launch last spring, transaction fees on the Ethereum blockchain are getting lower and lower:

Average transaction price from re

Figure 4 – Average transaction price from record high

Despite the gloom in prices, we can still play the hope card, arguing that transaction fees are such low They are an opportunity to move their addresses easier than in times of high activity.

👉 Also read – Ethereum (ETH): Ropsten testnet will close definitively in December

Advance in the world of cryptocurrencies with Cryptoast experts 📘

toaster icon

Source: Ultra Sound Money, Etherscan

Newsletter 🍞

Get a summary of crypto news every Monday by email 👌

What you need to know about affiliate links. This page presents assets, products or services related to investments. Some links in this article are affiliates. This means that if you buy a product or register on a site from this article, our partner pays us a commission. This allows us to continue to offer you original and useful content. There is no influence on you and you can even get a bonus by using our links.

Investments in cryptocurrencies are risky. Cryptoast is not responsible for the quality of the products or services presented on this page and could not be responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss incurred after the use of a product or service highlighted in this article on him. Investments involving crypto-assets are inherently risky, readers should do their own research before taking any action and only invest within the limits of their financial capabilities. This article does not constitute investment advice.

AMF recommendations. There is no guaranteed high return, high risk is associated with a product with high return potential. This risk must be in line with your project, your investment horizon and your ability to lose some of these savings. Do not invest unless you are prepared to lose all or part of your capital.

To go further, read our Financial Status, Media Transparency and Legal Notices pages.

Bitcoin (BTC) at $5,000 in 2023?

Bitcoin (BTC) at $5,000 in 2023?

After Taproot, the Bitcoin community tries to unlock the potential of DeFi

After Taproot, the Bitcoin community tries to unlock the potential of DeFi